Zip vs. Indeed – Appcast rankings

Zip vs. Indeed – Appcast rankings

Zip vs. Indeed – Appcast rankings

 
 
00:00 / 2:52
 
1X
 

It’s The Shred – a mini-Chad and Cheese bite of Breaking News — This is Chad Sowash

It’s the 2019 Appcast Publisher Ratings by Function

What is that you might say?
Simple – it says right here on the cover “Job ad publisher performance based on lowest cost-per-applicant and highest applicant volume”

These rankings were provided by Appcast and focus on 14 different functional areas, which I’ll cover in a minute.

In every single category Indeed was the WINNER of driving volume aka they drove the most clicks, but Indeed never led in driving the LOWEST COST PER APPLICANT.

Let’s be clear — Applicant is defined as an individual who completed the ATS application process.

Here are what I’m calling the WINNERS of Cost Per Application in all 14 functional areas…

ZipRecruiter – Accounting
Snag – Administrative & Clerical
ZipRecruiter – Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical
Glassdoor – Customer Service
ZipRecruiter – Engineering
Nexxt – Healthcare
ZipRecruiter – Human Resources
Appcast – Manufacturing & Production
ZipRecruiter – Marketing
Glassdoor – Restaurant
Glassdoor – Retail
Snag – Sales
Appcast – Technology
Appcast – Transportation

ZipRecruiter was ranked in the top 5 of all 14 Functional areas except Transportation. Other notable names in the top 5 rankings of these 14 functional areas.

Appcast – 12 of 14 — in the top 5
Glassdoor – 10 of 14
Indeed – 10 of 14
Talroo – 6 of 14
Monster – 5 of 14

If you want this report… You gotta have this report then just Google “Appcast 2019 Publisher Ratings”… You’re Welcome!

REMEMBER

Keep listening and comment wherever you do “the socials” – like our fb page, #chadcheese on twitter, hit us up on LinkedIn or visit ChadCheese.com where you can click on EVENTS, see where we’ll be next on our WORLD TOUR and maybe you score one of those FRESH LIMITED EDITION Chad & Cheese T-shirts.

SOWASH OUT!